The Inconvenient PR Truth

The Inconvenient PR Truth

Posted on 01. Feb, 2010 by Andrew in Community

The fine folks at Realwire (formally WebIT PR) have started a brave campaign called The Inconvenient PR Truth. I say “brave” because it clearly runs along in the wake of Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth but the very fact no one (that I’ve noticed) thinks this is out of line is a very good indicator to just how positive and needed the message is.

The message is; too many press releases are spam.

Stephen Davies , who works for Realwire as a consultant, pulls out three strong facts;

  1. 1.7 billion irrelevant press releases are emailed each year to US and UK based journalists.
  2. 78% of press release emails received by people are irrelevant
  3. 55% of people have taken action to stop getting press releases from these sources

An Inconvenient PR Truth from RealWire on Vimeo.

Realwire have an alternative press release host to Brinkwire but we still like them and this message. In fact, the concept of bugging people with a press release in the inbox is an old and dying one.

There are better, more modern, more relevant and more interactive ways to distribute a press release today. That’s our pitch here at Brinkwire. Here’s the elevator pitch reminder;

  1. a) Press releases distributed via a network of content suggestion widgets
  2. b) Press releases sped into Twitter and Google News
  3. c) RSS feeds built by tags and free-hand search to allow journalists, bloggers and other social media influencers to subscribe to a stream that interests them.
  4. Reblogging via Zemanta
  5. d) No emails.
Bookmark and Share

Related posts:

  1. It’s Muck Rack’s Tweet PR service but different. An alternative.
  2. Infinite RSS feeds from Brinkwire

Tags: , ,

  • Hi Andrew

    Thanks for covering the campaign and your very kind words about both it and us. As you say, though we have different approaches, it is clear we both value relevance and are trying to find ways to achieve it. We involved others in the campaign from the start precisely to make the point that trying to solve this problem will take a *lot* more than any one entity - however large or small.

    Thanks again
    Adam
  • Thanks for the comment. You made it to TechCrunch UK too :) and I think it's positive coverage http://eu.techcrunch.com/2010/01/28/press-releases-earth-killer-polluters-or-worse/
blog comments powered by Disqus